Permanently Deleted

2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
5 points

Hasn’t anyone ever gone to a flea market? When you start a negotiation you don’t say the “fair” price. You start way below the price you are willing to pay and the seller starts way higher than the “fair” price. But the point is starting the negotiation and reaching a middle point that satisfies both parties enough to have a deal signed.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point

The only way to end this war is to retreat from the war, stop fighting and killing and just chill already. But that will never be the case with a maniac like Putin and his minions in charge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That wouldn’t end the war, that would result in the continued wholesale slaughter of eastern Ukranians by their own government, the thing that Russia jumped in to stop in the first place. Please stop thinking about geopolitics in childish terms of maniacs and minions, life is not a Marvel movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That wouldn’t end the war, that would result in the continued wholesale slaughter of eastern Ukranians by their own government

Did Ukraine do that? Genuine question, not really educated in the pre-war history. Sounds a bit unbelievable to me at first glance. Feel free to provide reading material.

Please stop thinking about geopolitics in childish terms of maniacs and minions, life is not a Marvel movie.

Of course not. I wanted to keep it short and on point.
However, war will continue as long as there are forces at play who want the war. Putin is certainly one of these war-driving forces, as well as his minions his top-people in military and politics. Given the expansionistic approach, the numerous threats, even against children, creates a pretty insane picture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think it was a very calculated move actually. He did this right before the Switzerland circus, and it forced the west to say that they reject peace. This shows the rest of the world that it is indeed the west that wants the war to keep going which makes it impossible for western diplomats to go around claiming that Russia doesn’t want peace.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You clearly vastly underestimate the Western diplomatic cores ability to lie in the face of obvious fact and get away with it

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

lol that’s true, they will go on to make clowns of themselves regardless

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Offering someone a peace deal when you know they wont take it is a chad move. Just like Hamas saying it will disarm in exchange for a prisoner swap and a lasting end to hostilities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Stalin Putin shouldn’t have stopped at Berlin Bakhmut.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

He is asking for much more than he currently holds. I’d expect this from a war party that is about to overrun the enemy. But despite Russia slowly getting the upper hand, they still have a long way to go to win this war and they still might lose it.

Therefore I don’t think this is an honest offer.

permalink
report
reply

Nah, there was never any point where Russia was going to lose this unless countries other than Ukraine joined in with more than just grift money and weapon donations but with actual troops on a large scale (beyond just small scale mercs that are easy to deny). And fortunately that wasn’t too likely to happen because even the most belligerent NATO warhawks knew it would be seriously risking global nuclear war. So many internet armchair generals, mostly NAFO dipshits but plenty of Russia-aligned SMO-watchers too, were (and are) way too focused on the lines on the map, the fine details of kettles and who held what small towns, etc, all without recognizing the bigger picture: long term attrition. In that sense, Russia has always had the upper hand by a large margin. That’s not going to change either. Russia is, as you say, “slowly getting the upper hand,” in the more obvious ways but this was always what was in the cards and it’s just going to continue in that same inevitable direction. The only way Russia will lose this war is if there is some major change in how things are set up on the global stage.

Also it’s not really true to say that Russia is asking for more than they hold because even if some areas are still contested, Ukraine has no chance of hanging on to them. As others have noted, this is a very generous offer and I expect it’s only being made because Russia is plainly aware that Ukraine will not accept it (in fact Ukraine cannot accept it because those who fund them, those who are using Ukraine as their proxy and who are ultimately responsible for all this, wouldn’t allow them to). That’s the only way in which this offer is “dishonest,” if you consider it dishonest for Russia to propose a plan they know full well that there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell of Ukraine accepting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Bro, learn to write in paragraphs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bro, learn to read paragraphs. My comment above is literally made up of two of them of very normal and standard size. Have you ever read a book? Paragraphs written in places other than twitter or reddit tend not to be broken up arbitrarily every 2 sentences like it seems you wanted me to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You don’t know what your are writing about. Like, factually incorrect.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Just because you aren’t used to hearing about the vast reality beyond the propaganda bubble you’ve (knowingly or unknowingly) confined yourself to, that doesn’t mean that something you encounter outside of that bubble that contradicts it isn’t factually the truth. If anything, as a rule of thumb, it’s more likely to be closer to the truth if it contradicts whatever narrative nonsense you’ve been swallowing from any given large western media news outlet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Putins pledges are not worth the ink used to make them

permalink
report
reply
10 points

The options are a peace deal or a destruction of one of the parties, and Russia is not going to be destroyed by this.

What direction would you prefer for the people living in Ukraine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

‘Russia is not going to X’ is a very weak argument, and over the last 10 years Russia crossed many of those Xs, regardless of you thinking it’s not going to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But the X here is not about a Russian foreign policy decision per se, but about their overall military standing as part of their invasion of Ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

whatever russia says, they mean to do the opposite. they’ve been pulling this nonsense from the start and this is no different, and we know this because they are STILL THERE. if they wanted peace, THEY’D LEAVE. ukraine doesn’t have a choice, they have nowhere to go. they can’t pull out of the conflict because they are literally the one being invaded. there is no logic to this argument. it’s like ordering cheese and wondering why you are served cheese. it’s plain and dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Isn’t it interesting that the official US gov line on Gaza, a sealed off prison zone currently experiencing a second Holocaust that the zionist entity has no intention of stopping, is that “Hamas could end this any time”

But the nazi coup government of Ukraine, which doesn’t even have public support and which has rejected every peace offering for years and have broken multiple treaties because they just couldn’t stop slaughtering their own people in the east…they are the smol beans with nowhere to go.

You have internalized a perfectly backwards propagandistic framing of the situation: It is the Kyiv regime that can end this tomorrow by simply accepting that the people of the Donbas region do not want to be ruled by them. Russia has no interest in western Ukraine, no interest in ruling a bunch of people who hate them, they want a buffer zone so they don’t have a warmongering authoritarian power’s nukes on their border. I mean shit, we’ve been bombing their nuclear detection radar stations lately. If that’s not the action of a deranged empire playing with the lives of the entire world, nothing is. Can you fucking imagine what the reaction would be if they were doing that to us? We would have scoured the planet of life by now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

ukraine doesn’t have a choice, they have nowhere to go. they can’t pull out of the conflict because they are literally the one being invaded

You are right in that they have nowhere to go but it’s because NATO won’t let them accept peace but will force them to keep fighting until that last working class Ukrainian is dead. Russia is literally offering them a way out of more bloodshed right now, literally the topic of this post. They also could have avoided all of this by simply honoring the Minsk Agreements, but it was Ukraine breaking those agreements (including by shelling their own people in the east) that led to Russia “invading” by entering a conflict that had already been initiated by Ukraine trying to ethnically cleanse the east. It’s funny you start by saying that Russia is untrustworthy, but Ukraine and NATO are the ones who very explicitly and admittedly broke their agreements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

whatever russia says, they mean to do the opposite

This is silly. Do you think Russian politicians are always just having fun playing this word game or something?

they’ve been pulling this nonsense from the start and this is no different, and we know this because they are STILL THERE. if they wanted peace, THEY’D LEAVE.

That doesn’t make any sense. Their occupation is leverage. Giving up leverage always puts you in a worse negotiating position. The original causes of the invasion are also unresolved. What you are essentially suggesting is that Russia capitulate for the third time re: Ukraine and hope for a different outcome. The reason they invaded in the first place is that nobody in leadership, rationally, thinks they should fall for that again.

The outcome you would like to see is likely impossible. So what possible outcome do you want?

ukraine doesn’t have a choice, they have nowhere to go. they can’t pull out of the conflict because they are literally the one being invaded. there is no logic to this argument. it’s like ordering cheese and wondering why you are served cheese. it’s plain and dumb.

I think this might just be a misunderstanding. Of course Ukraine can’t un-invade itself. And I agree that Ukraine doesn’t have much choice, but I think so in a different way. They don’t have much choice because they are not really a sovereign county. Their terms are heavily influenced by Western powers. The original attempts at a peace deal we blown up by Westwen leaders. This is unfortunate for the people of Ukraine, as they don’t deserve to die just so that Western countries can try to stick it to Russia.

I think the best outcome is to achieve a peace deal as quickly as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Go sign up for the ukranian military if you want to see more grist for the meat grinder, coward

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Liberals try not to be homophobic/transphobic for two fucking seconds challenge.

You are just like the Zionists that say the same about people standing with the people of Gaza.

I would say more but it would go against this instance civility rules, you’ll just have to get creative with your imagination to know how we feel about the likes of you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

Because advocating for it to continue is sending others to their death. Same energy as wanting president’s children on the front line, because without that understanding, people are way more willing to advocate continuing slaughter

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 37

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments