107 points
*

Lol I love that pane 3 just skips over all the important bits. “Yeah so I’m just in possession of capital as an a priori part of my existence which you don’t have, please don’t focus on why that is the case, maybe I got all that money from making pie charts really good, who knows.”

permalink
report
reply

Most of the panels skip over very important questions. Mr. Moneybags has some kind of vision, which implicitly seems to mean he has a right to privately own an industrial process. He analyzed the market, which just so happened to tell him exactly what he wanted to hear. Then it turns out none of that actually mattered because he needs the laborer to actually manifest the tea cups into reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

And yet, despite all the backround capital and investment and research, without that one key element his dream will only and forever remain a dream. It couldn’t possibly the most valuable part of the production process as a result; it couldn’t be!

permalink
report
parent
reply

without that one key element his dream will only and forever remain a dream

The investment capital and research are essential elements, too. The takeaway isn’t that Mustache Asshole Guy deserves nothing. The takeaway is that he should get paid in accordance with whatever actual work he did developing the marketing plan, whoever built the machinery should get paid in accordance with the actual work that went into that, and the laborer on the line working the machine should get paid in accordance with the work he’s doing. What shouldn’t happen is Mustache Asshole Guy getting to take other laborers’ hard-earned money just because (somehow, magically, without any explanation) he was sitting on a boatload of capital to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Realistically what actually happens is all 4 panels is a boss explaining what others workers came up with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

maybe I got all that money from making pie charts really good

Data scientists irl

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Anyone else love how something like 90% of being a lefty is having to contend with lazily wrought strawmen? Love when more than half the burden is getting people to correctly understand what they’re arguing against.

permalink
report
reply

Hey, it’s in many ways easier than having to deal with good arguments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I guess, but I personally struggle with it more almost, because there’s something weirdly demoralizing and frustrating about people throwing out arguments that shitty because they’ve picked them up from chud youtube or whatever. Like, for every one I go through to try and refute, it feels like a dozen more jackasses come to parrot the same anti-communist propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The overwhelming horde of chud takes vs one leftist sword person

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, it can be grating. What I find heartening is that talking to people and gradually pulling them left is working. Just look at the presence of anything left of Obama today vs. 2014 or 2015. It’s night and day.

But it’s always good to log off for a bit, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

It depends. The guy (and yes, it’s a guy) who mainlines Ben Shapeeno videos and was president of his College Republicans chapter? Yeah, you’re not going to convince them of anything.

But in a media environment that’s been saturated with militant anti-communism for at least the last 70 years, you’re also going to find plenty of people who regurgitate bad arguments because they’ve passively assimilated them from the background noise and never really dug into the matter. If you get them interested in digging a little deeper, you might get somewhere.

And of course – especially online – there are always the folks reading, listening to, or watching the conversation but not participating. They might be closer to that second guy, but they have enough doubts about a bad argument to not voice it themselves. They might be persuadable even if you can’t reach the first two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“You just want free stuff!!!”

Yeah so fucking what?

permalink
report
parent
reply

We don’t want free stuff for ourselves, we want free stuff for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

hahaha no one pays for training anymore.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

My favorite thing about my job is showing the CEO just how much turnover and the lack of a coherent on boarding process costs our company, and that those costs are 10x more than just paying people a wage that’s in the middle, as opposed to the bottom 10th percentile.

permalink
report
parent
reply

My previous employer sent me for external training once in ten years and it was basically just to keep me leaving for a bit longer. It cost them under $1000.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I should have been more clear. I meant they don’t tend to want to train new employees. They hire people who already know the job so they can save money and “eliminate risk” They’ll train employees that have been there for a while already “proven themselves” sometimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

No this is fair, we can place a value on the bosses initial labour.

once that loan is paid back they can, of course, fuck off.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

I want to know more about this magical tea cup making machine. One that doesn’t require any labor to run

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Atlas, why don’t you just do it yourself then? If it doesn’t require that much work, why don’t you just make all the teacups without purchasing others labor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

They love painting owners as entrepreneurs, but never bother defending the owner who’s not the founder. Their entire justification collapses when the owner is not the founder, but just a rich leech who bought out the company. A lot of entrepreneurs basically have to go beg these leeches for more capital when they run out and trade huge stakes of their company’s ownership just to keep going. Or they get established and just sell it to the rich for a payout.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Yeah, I notice these sorts love to bring up Henry Ford as an example to try to defend billionaires and CEOs, which, even if we ignore the fact that he was a turd to the laborers he relied upon for his fortune, isn’t an accurate comparison the vast majority of the time, because most of these modern business giants are just some chode that walks in to an already extant company and manages to simply avoid crashing the gravy train.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Also Henry Ford was a fascist. Like so bad that he may have influenced Hitler with his “the International Jew” magazine.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Their entire justification collapses when the owner is not the founder, but just a rich leech who bought out the company.

Or the founder’s big wet failson. A great place to point this out is in pro sports teams.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 26

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 143K

    Comments